Patricia Arquette of CSI: Cyber—Fat Because of Soda?
(Nothing important to read here, folks, so just move along,
move along. Only rambling, but felt like
jotting down something that was on my mind. . .people do such things on blogs.
. . .)
Standing in line at the grocery store staring at celeb
gossip magazines earlier today. Prince
William may be losing his hair, or something else, maybe. Already did write a post about Martin Short’s
craven advertising for life-shortening products. Watched a ‘sode of this new CSI show on the
computer, the second one I’ve seen.
I saw Patricia Arquette on The Daily Show a while back, promoting her new show. She was wearing some kind of 70s-puce-coloured
pyjama knit tight-fitting dress/pullover ($14 at Wal-Mart?) that emphasized her
every roll. Odd choice. Don’t get me wrong—I basically think people
should weigh virtually whatever they’re comfortable with. . .but of course
obviously there are points at which health factors must come into play. On CSI:
Cyber, Arquette seems always to be dressed in “slimming,” or de-outlining
black. (Strange, now that I think of it,
that the producers aren’t going with cleavage, for this is something all true female
CSIs always brandish on TV.)
Anyway anyway, I see in the two episodes of CSI: Cyber that I’ve seen that a feature
of Patricia Arquette’s character is that she’s always holding a tub of soda
when she’s walking around the quasi-lit monitor-festooned windowless enclaves
where real CSI people always work.
Heaven knows what she does on an airplane or just how giant are the
custom-made cupholders they had to put in the obnoxious more or less
unmanoevreable monster SUVs they always make CSIs drive. (Question: is it only sponsorship and vehicle placement, or is there any possible
reason that CSIs need 15 ft. of vehicle space behind them when driving to a scene where they only use flashlights
and rubber gloves? Maybe there’s lots of
bodies to stack up in the back, I guess, but I thought others took care of that
while CSIs caught bad guys or looked at those astonishingly instantaneously
informative computers rather than ferrying corpses.)
Now if Patricia Arquette is big or getting bigger, yes, yes,
I know it’s probably not because of her soda tubs on TV. Judging by their appearance and the way she
airily waves them around like tissues, the way the straws always stick way straight
up like toothpicks in an ice-cube tray, I guess they’re empty. Hm.
Maybe the show producers are trying to suggest that her size is because of her soda addiction. At any rate, it seems like the soda tub is
meant to be linked with her character throughout the serial—or maybe the
producers are already planning/have planned an episode in which she has a heart
attack or something and has to give up soda and it becomes a crisis in her
life. I’m doubting that a bit, though,
for we rarely see the personal sides of detective characters. Remember how “Horatio Cain (sp?)” always
found a way to show up at the funerals of victims whose crimes he’d solved
(maybe he’s still doing it); that man was working 24/7, and since he probably
slept in so many graveyards, he probably needed those sunglasses at dawn.
So Arquette’s overweight—no, there is no gender double
standard here. Overweight people of all
kinds have been all over TV forever; with the early radio and TV Dragnet, Frank was portly and interested
in food. More power to ‘em, just less
power to them to dictate their own mortality, is all. I said all this stuff in my Martin Short
post, anyway. ((Speaking only
personally, I think it is more attractive (and possibly more healthy, though I
wouldn’t know), to be a bit more overweight than underweight.))
Of course, back in the day, EVERYONE was always
smoking. Pretty well every radio serial
was sponsored by—not alcohol or cars or trucks or even oil companies so
much—but cigarettes. NOTHING was more
ubiquitous. But nowadays, cigarettes are
so frowned upon that you might see fake ones or unlit ones, or whatever. Now think about what kills Americans—heart
disease, diabetes, obesity, etc.—why would Hollywood
draw up a character such as Arquette who is always waving around a garish soda
tub? On a show where the writers sit
around all day trying to dream up the most sick and convoluted and improbable
murders, why would they write a lead character who chooses the most obvious
self murder? I mean, cigarettes were supposed to be cool, or something, or
evince adulthood, or satisfy sponsors or show brand affiliation, or offer a
prop way to emphasize dialogue or gestures, say. What can a giant soda tub do? How is it cool or a pivotal addition to
Arquette’s “range” of character traits? It
looks idiotic, like Yosemite Sam carrying around a BlackBerry. I thought
Hollywood millionaires ate well and health consciously, to the extent of pretty
much starving to death rural Peru
by driving up demand and prices for quinoa, for example. I don’t get it. I don’t get how Hollywood, which is prepared
to create and display endless violence, but will hair-split and mince around or
even come out guns blazing against the most minor social offenses, will develop
a leading character for a top franchise that shows her always attached to what
tends to kill thousands upon thousands of Americans every year. Do you buy that “role model” thing? I sure don’t.
I liked hockey as a kid, but it certainly never occurred to me when I
was playing that a guy on a pro team was some sort of “role model.” But we’re addicted to this idea of “role
models,” so let’s try it on: “Mommy mommy, I want to be a cool boss CSI
someday, like Patricia Arquette—she’s so cool. . .and she gets to drink Coke
all day!!!” Yes Virginia , you keep doing that and balloon to
200 and see how many job offers you get, no matter how brilliant you are at
delegating. I don’t know. Maybe it’s meant to “humanize” Arquette—make
us see that this steely boss nevertheless has food or drink obsessions most of
us can relate to.
Why couldn’t they always have shown Arquette drinking coffee
or tea? These are chemically very
complex beverages that, on the whole, science has suggested are largely
beneficial. Further, shows like CSI invest a great deal in creating an illusion of reality and seriousness—so
then why the h*** would a supposedly cerebral top CSI do something that was so
patently life-shortening and foolish?
How is she going to catch bad guys when she’s dead at 55? That’s a lot of bad guys she might otherwise
have caught as she approached retirement.
Yes ok, minds more brilliant and attentive than mine have no
doubt already worked out this soda addiction topcop thing on the internet. I’m just rambling, as I told you at the start
I was. Weird that ultra-sensitive Hollywood would write a
star for a major series who so evidently had a (relatively non-addictive—I
mean, soda isn’t heroin) life-shortening habit.
Well, that’s my piffle post for now. It just struck me so I wrote a few (ok
hundred) words, is all.
--zr
No comments:
Post a Comment