Wednesday, 27 November 2013

A Brief History of "Oh So Many Years"


A Brief History of “Oh So Many Years”

 _1_

 Norah Jones and Billie Joe Armstrong (2013)


 starts at around 23:28, so go back.

 --Billie heard the Everlys' Songs Our Daddy Taught Us, and thought, since he was rich and famous, he’d like to cover it.  His wife urged Norah, who he’d once met at an awards gala, as someone to do it with him.  So it happened, over a total of 9 days.  The Everlys, of course, came from a steeped tradition going back generations.  But if you’ve got the money and a hint o’ time, well, that cures all defects.
 
Billie kind of turns it into a honky-tonk song and uses a big lead riff that makes it almost rockabilly.  He intended to stay true to the "original" Everlys, but in this instance he allowed himself some latitude.

You can hear everyone striving for a sparseness true to an original, but they can’t restrain themselves, such showoffs are they, and also so much do they love the song.  Reminds me of Emmylou and Gram, a bit; Emmylou fed off the Bailey Bros., as did so many.  But see below.

 _2_

 The Everlys – Songs Our Daddy Taught Us (1958)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv6U-5agib8

 --This must have been a bit of a weird album; after a couple of big hits like “Wake Up, Little Susie” (banned in Toronto in ‘58), the Everlys had to provide more content, overnight.  So. . .songs they knew from youth and had sung forever.  Even Phil at 76 admitted that they didn’t really know what they were singing; they were just striving for good harmonies and music and to please an audience and so on. 

They explicitly used only an acoustic guitar and bass; they wanted the songs to sound like they would be heard on a porch. What they knew.  What they had.

Or that would give cache', too, a bit like Billie Joe and Norah now.

Notice _1_ sounds like a cacophony with all kinds of things happening at the same time so that the import of the song, lyrically, is lost.  Drums destroying any sense of the music. 

 I like how the Everlys' voices hadn’t even seemed to break by 20; Kentucky never met science.  Those steel-stringed acoustics, those voices like silken filaments (ever tried to break silk?).  Vulnerable, enduring, frail, resonant.

Everlys works for me.  An early vocal pop tune.

 _3_

The Bailes Brothers aka The Bailey Brothers (1949)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d54zakYox58

 Of course, nothing comes from nowhere, and the Everlys (songs our daddy taught us) learned from the Bailes, or Bailey Brothers; that’s where they got the harmony.  The Everlys' dad could easily have introduced this one, since it was in his puberty. 

The steel guitar put the melancholy in the song, and the banjo lends the bouzouki-type sound; if one hasn’t a grand piano or a sophisticated horn or wind instrument, one has voices or banjo with its available steel strings. Notice this sound.

Importantly, Billie Joe Armstrong made Norah Jones swear that she would listen to no other versions of the Everlys’ album.  Clearly, however, he did; his entire approach to the song, and obviously the lead riff from _1_, is based on the original by the Baileys.  Yep, women.  Keep ‘em in the dark.  Never let them know or they might mess it up.  Billie Joe just wanted to make sure Norah sang the high Don part. This overproduced version, _1_, actually loses something by Jones not being ½ way in control of the song, as she isn’t.  It gets throwaway honky-tonk instead of meaningfully moving.  Still, good song; captivating, captive female; I can get into that, but in the end I’m a man and it ends up being a long way from a “Rocking Good Way” with Brook Benton and Dinah Washington.

_4_

Turns out that this song was written by Marie or Maria, “Frankie,” Bailes, wife of Walter Bailes or Bailey, when she was, well, maybe not so legitimate by today’s standards.  Walter, like others of his brothers, got to be a priest.   I think, though, that that is where the special feeling comes into this song.  The writer is not just thinking of the future, as we do now, but of the past, and of sins then.  She is saying: “let me sin again, and I will make it right.”  That is where the peculiar power of this song comes from.  It is not, if you listen to Billie Joe now, about a guy longing for a girl, and it is not even, if you listen to the Everlys or the Baileys, an ambiguous song about heartache and longing; actually it is about a striated troubled love for someone that may be illicit—potentially damning.  This is where the “years” of the song come from if you’re 16, or even 18.  I defy an18-yr-old girl today to write this song.  Or maybe I don’t.  Frankie is imagining back into a longing that seems to have gone on for decades; and if you've ever been 16, a couple of months can be that long.

 This song is not about Billie Joe of Green Day, or Norah Jones; it’s about a young girl, and that’s where this great music came from.  Would Billie Joe, or Norah, or for that matter even Phil or Don Everly, choose “oh so many years” as a chorus line? 

so _5_

The song was written a long time ago by a woman for a man. The later renditions are great, as I've said above, but I am haunted by the missing voice in this song.  And that's the lead voice of the woman in this song, and also the one who wrote it.  It sure ain't, ain't, ever Billy Joe.  I hope a great female singer will do this song again one day and put it in its rightful place in the country pantheon.

-zr

 

Sunday, 24 November 2013

Don Cherry Inaugurates Rob Ford in 2014


I jes wanna, jes wanna come down here and tell you kids, you kids out there, what a great guy Rob Ford is.  Now, now, maybe you’re sayin’ he’s a big crack smoker.  Maybe ok.  But I seen this guy smokin’ crack, and lord love ‘im, he smoked crack.  Heh, heh, I put him out there once at the BBQ in Mississauga, an’ boy that kid loved to smoke crack.

But he did it—you know why, you know why?  BECAUSE he loved to smoke crack; that’s why he did it, kids.  And doan let anyone tell you anything else in life.  You wanna smoke crack and get to be mayor, then you do that.  Doan let anyone tell you.  You coaches out there, I toald you. . . . .  Dis guy, dis guy. . . .

Well, c’mon c’mon what else I got?

But hey, I know I’m gonna get in trouble for dis, you people, you people who like to say—an-an-anyway—stop interruptin’—I say he’s a good boy, and geez I used to see him.  Saw him play waterboy for the tiny-mite Ice-Hogs. 

Thing about Rob—the thing about Rob is--is he just don’t like these, these people, callin’ ‘im names ‘n everyfink.  Get me mad too.  And you know, you know what you just doan wanna do, it’s get these boys mad atchew, ‘cuz then there’s gonna come some boys stick up for ya.’  It’s like Wensink I had.  He wannent no mad dog—got 20 goals for me--but boy, you doan wanna mess with him, alright!s  I seen Doug Ford, I ‘member Dougie Sr., guys’d rip your throat out, but anyway, just sayin.’  That’s the way we did it back then!!

Alright, what else we got?  So like I’m sayin,’ guy comes down to the City Hall, buncha weirdos down there an’ I dunno.  Guy just tries to make it right, take care a business!!  That’s all.  You’d think, you’d think, these people’d say “thank you,” but whadda we get?  Whadda we get??  Hoa people.

I’m just sayin,’ if it was you people.  Fine broth of a lad, Robbie.  Maybe Chunky like I did with this stiff ‘ere, anyway.  What else we got?

So this guy, this guy, is the kinda guy you wanna go to war with.  Smokin’ crack, whatever.  You people, you people just don’t get it.  Kids, everyone wants an obese idiot who drinks vodka and drives and smokes crack.  You coaches out there, you gotta stop sayin’ “oh, I’m the hoity-toity.”  Come off it!!  Nobody else wants to be around there when he is.  You wanna have ‘em ridin’ shotgun, just like Semenko.

Now, now, now I wanna get to something that really breaks me up here, it’s about a guy, fireman guy, lord love him, he was just 28, 2 kids, comin’ home, tried to help somebody when he was off duty, turns out some crack-smokin’ pinko run ‘im down when he was just tryin’ to help, off duty an’ everything.  So this one is for major-sargeant-brigade-major-reserves-princess-patricias-firemean dude—lord love him.  Thumbs up.

-zr

 

Saturday, 9 November 2013

Just Give Me 5.10.15 Minutes of Your Hate: Parsing Rob Ford’s Rage


Just Give Me 5.10.15 Minutes of Your Hate: Parsing Rob Ford’s Rage

 

Yeah, I don’t know, I thought of one of Ruth Brown’s signature R&B songs (“5.10.15 Hours of Your Love”) when I watched Rob Ford’s drunken rant video (http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2013/11/07/mayor_rob_ford_caught_in_video_rant.html).

 

I only watched it once and I don’t need to see it again; it’s gross and pathetic, but it’s what 1/3 of Canadians will vote for and support, come hell or high water.  *That,* not Rob Ford, is what is sad.  Hand him a microphone, and Don Cherry, that erstwhile bare-knuckles moralist, will still support a train wreck as the leader of Canada’s largest city.  Would Don Cherry support Rob Ford as his team captain with the Springfield Indians?  Probably not.  But as Mayor of his city, you bet, because Rob, flushed though he never not is, it at least not a “pinko.”  Even if he didn’t “make the trains run on time,” even if he didn’t fulfill his promises, Rob is still the guy who *says* he’ll make the trains run on time, and that’s enough for 1/3 of Canadian voters.  You just have to say.  You don’t have to do.  You preach “accountability,” but then you use Canada’s largest city’s City Hall as a man-cave, and somehow that’s not “entitlement.”  Just what do Conservatives mean when they use words like “accountability” and “entitlement”?  ??  What do they mean?

 

Anyway, as for the video.  Well, my title, above, is probably misleading.  Sorry.  Who can parse, or should bother parsing, a drunken rant?  But I don’t know; one ought always to try to interpret and figure things out. What struck me was, IIRC, that Ford said first that he needed 10 minutes to kill a guy and rip his throat out and gouge out his eyes and so on. . .and then 5. . .but then also 15, I think.  Now, when you’re seriously, seriously drunk, all points narrow to a miniscule place in front of your feet (years since Rob saw his, but whatever).  With the bravado of a drunkard who knows he’s got whiskey bravery, Ford assures his audience that he is not one to be messed with, even when messed up.  He is, despite the handful of neurons he’s got left firing, pretty focused—pretty focused, in his own mind, on those who might call him down.  He lets people know, on no uncertain terms, that he will—and can—mess up anyone up who messes with him and his family.  But then, in the intensity of his rage/mock bravado, etc., he can’t seem to fix on a timeline.  First it’s 10 minutes, then it’s 5, then it’s 15, etc.  Even a drunken drunk can often fixate on just one thing; indeed, sometimes just one thing is all a drunken drunk can fixate on.  But Rob Ford can’t even seem to do this.  He can’t get his story straight even when he’s reduced to miniscule capacity on the one subject that is what is animating what is left of his mental functioning.  Rob Ford might be a good motivator as a football coach—who knows?  But I’d hate for him to be drawing up plays in the red zone when we’re down by 6 with no time left on the clock.  He can’t even figure out how long it would take him to kill someone.

 

As a former longtime Torontonian, I feel for Toronto.  I don’t think anyone can actually love Toronto, possibly not anyone even born there (and imagine all the changes Toronto has absorbed, whether you’ve lived there 5 or 75 years!!  How many other cities, anywhere, have changed as much, as successfully, as Toronto?), but Toronto can earn one’s grudging respect.  I hope both of you who might read this really get what I’m saying; Toronto really isn’t about you.  Toronto is about a big city that slowly, slowly makes you feel like an individual.  You can’t say that about many other capitals—try it in Rome or Sydney or Paris or Stockholm or whatever—just try it.  In its way, Toronto is one of the great cities.  And it’s sad to see it in the world press because of Ford, a suburban fatman offered the keys to a massive economic and cultural sector.  I’m astonished that it even has made the news.  It’s well-nigh impossible for Canada to make the world news anywhere, for any reason, but Harper on the environment and foreign policy and Ford with his crack seem to be doing yeoman service in that regard.  Politicians behave badly everywhere, but maybe the reason the world press has become so fixated on what Harper and Ford are doing is precisely because what they are doing are things that they—those presses and countries—had just never expected of Canada—destroying the environment, being a total outlier on small-arms treaties, joining basically no-one on automatic support for Israel while other countries are at least contemplative and hopeful of dialogue, closing embassies and shutting off contact, smoking crack as the leading civic official of the biggest city, and so on.  It’s like finding out your uncle was (pick your notorious criminal), but not only is loud and proud about it, he’s only momentarily repentant and keen and sure to be re-elected.

 

Canada needs a moral reset.  I can sort of understand how we’ve come to this pass (another subject), but it sure better be an interregnum, and I hope Canadians of generations succeeding mine will restore Canada’s moral compass.

 

I always tried to sway European friends away from the automatic allure of cities like Los Angeles (I’ve been there, and it ain’t no tv and the angels walk by night), but now Canada isn’t looking at all like the really basically cosmopolitan or otherwise down-to-earth place that it kind of is; instead, it just looks like some vicious redneck backwater.  My guess is that is why Canada is at last getting some world attention—because it is looking just as tawdry and corrupt and venally self-interested as other countries it used to hold itself above.

 

There’s a lot I don’t like about the Ford coverage—the chequebook journalism, or at least the creep of it, the going to a guy’s house as he’s leaving for work—I don’t support that.  But with his sense of entitlement, his refusal to be accountable, and the company he keeps (from countless lowlifes and criminals to Jim Flaherty and Prime Minister Stephen Harper), Ford has brought it on himself.  I’m tired and weary of people who say he should “take a couple weeks off” or “get help.”  Rob Ford invited cameras to see him “get help” for his soda pop addiction and take off some pounds—how did that work?  And when the Fords “get help,” you kinda just generally don’t want to know those people.  When Dougie and Robbie and their Dad “get help,” they tend not to be speaking of nannies.  Rob Ford thinks he can make his problems go away if he just says “I’m sorry,” and sadly, he’s probably right.  But all those who say “he should just take a leave of absence” are just as morally supine.  It is comical to think that Rob Ford can just take a couple weeks off or “get treatment” and rebound as a changed man, as one who has changed the entire lineage of his entitled, bullying, criminal family.  If a mob don went into rehab for a couple months, would you hire him as your butler?

 

No, the people who voted and will keep voting for Rob Ford need a reset.  We must stop admiring not just flawed people, but flawed people who boast of killing people.  Because eventually, one way or another, those people do end up implicated in the killing of others. (How often have you stumbled around a dining room, drunk or not, ranting about killing someone in graphic terms?  Again, don’t answer that, for I guess I just don’t know how the world has changed.) We have to stop admiring and voting for people who are clearly involved in criminal underworlds just because it suits our ideologies.  Other countries have clawed their ways out of such mentalities; we seem to be clawing our way in.

 

Rob Ford is a sad, sad case (and who isn’t, at one time or another—I’m not setting myself above him, except that I don’t share his fondness for criminals and lowlifes and drugs and far-right entitled cronies, etc.).  I’d like to like the guy; I would have a beer and talk football or hockey with him.  But in his progressive involvement in crime, and through his sense of entitlement inherited through his bullying family, he has brought problems upon himself.  Clearly, it came from his parents and his father.  You don’t get to be Rob Ford without some pretty stern tutelage.  Now he and his family have brought shame on his city and his country.  Such is his sense of entitlement and lack of accountability, though, that he and his buddies like Don Cherry and Jim Flaherty and Stephen Harper think that they can just “move on.”  

 

Maybe the worst thing that ever happened to Toronto was the GTA.  That gave us adulterer Mel Lastman not wanting to go to Africa for fear he’d be boiled in a pot (you’d think a guy like Mel would know something about stereotyping and its darker outcomes), calling in the military for a snowstorm, etc.  People who live in the GTA need a reset.  They need to start thinking of themselves as citizens of what is at least potentially really one of the world’s great cities, and not as people whose windows on the world are two-car garages.

 

Enough.

 

--zr