On the far-right CBC Rex Murphy program the other day, Rex
was inviting Canadians to call in and join in on his hagiographical paean to
his idol. He bagged a few Tory
bagpeople, like Rod Love and Joan Crockatt, to help him on his onanistic
foray. I only heard bits and pieces of
Rex’s fevered longings while I did other things, and my guess is that the
Murphy screeners were NOT allowed to let anyone say anything negative about
Klein (the word means “little,” or “small,” or “dinky” or “petty” etc. in
German).
If you live where I do, it’s all Ralph all the time now, of
course. Soon the Calgary
International Airport will be renamed the “Ralph
Klein International
Airport ,” and when that’s not good
enough, it will, paraphrasing Colbert, be renamed again, the “Ralph Klein
Ralph Klein
International Airport .” You read it here first.
So whatever, since hagiography is the order of the day,
allow a studious monk to have somewhat of a say. Here’s a few of my reflections.
--My first was when I was a little kid and I got to have a
special individual trip to CFCN as part of a school programme. I was sitting with a CFCN cameraman in a
small warren, asking goggle kid questions about cameras, and Ralph, then a
reporter, rocked in hammered and unleashed a torrent of the bluest language I’d
ever heard in my life. I guess it was
all over some prank that he was engaged in with another reporter, involving
film and trees in front of his house and on his doorstep and so on. I still can’t say I knew exactly what was
going on there, but if I had to try to figure it out, then or now, I’d say that
it went like this—Ralph played a prank, and someone got back at him, and Ralph
was some p’o’ed. Then he went away
swearing. I recognized Ralph from
tv. Ralph never looked down at me, and
the hairy cameraman whose name I don’t remember, and who was a good guy with
me, kind of didn’t really respond much because, well, there was a little kid in
his little editing room. But Ralph, red
as ever, was some p’o’ed.
--Not so long after becoming mayor of Calgary , and being around for the 1988 winter
Olympics, Ralph was supposed to appear at a dinner/reception for a central
European city that was considering a bid for the Olympics; they wanted to know
what his worship had to say about how to bring the big event to their
city. My closest friend’s family was
there, partly as community representatives, partly even as translators. An hour goes by, another hour, another hour,
no Ralph. The delegation waits patiently
for his worship to arrive. Ralph does rock in around 11 p.m., drunk as a
skunk, and tells the delegation that, as he slurs his words, “if ya wanna, if
ya wanna, if ya wanna have the Olympics, whatcha, whatcha gotta do, is, is, ya
gotta (and here Ralph grabs his crotch) have balls!!”
--then I guess there’s the environmental and financial destruction
during his MLA and premier tenure.
Elsewhere on this blog, I have criticized former Alberta premier
Lougheed, but he did imagine things such as the heritage fund and caring for
special parts of Albertan geography such as Kannanaskis country; under Ralph,
Albertans found a minister of golf course development and a premier who tried
to buy votes by sending Albertans paltry cheques and beggaring the ability of
public representatives to represent the people in terms of such things as
education and health care. I also
criticized Lougheed over his anti-Canadian attitudes that, surprise, surprise,
the Conservatives are suddenly rethinking, but now as he lies in state, Ralph’s
“let the eastern creeps and bums freeze in the dark” comments are somehow being
recollected as statesmanlike.
--speaking of education, I guess there’s the papers Ralph
plagiarized for Athabasca
University . Ralph figured Pinochet was a pretty savvy
guy, really, but somehow he just kinda got the politics a bit wrong. A funny number of people say this about
Hitler, too, but it just ain’t funny, and yet Ralph gets majority adoration for
hailing murderous dictators. Hm. I guess the average Albertan figures that, hey,
so my kid gets kidnapped and disappeared, well, it’s just good policy. I wonder
if there will be anyone at Ralph’s wakes and/or doing his eulogies who will
“have the balls” to read from Ralph’s political science papers in which he
figures that, hey, Pinochet was a smart leader who just got sidetracked by some
socialist ratbags. I guess we’ll have to
wait a while on those. But lawyers, I
invite you. Read them into the record,
kindly. Lawyers?
--then there’s Ralph kicking off his campaign in ’04 by taunting
poor people on income supplements, saying that some apparent critics (who may
or may not have been on supplements) were “smoking cigarettes and wearing
cowboy hats” (things Ralph never did)
and sure didn’t look like they were hurting.
When Mitt Romney told convives at a gala that basically 47% of Americans
were losers freeloading off him and his audience, Americans, who often do have
a sense of what is right and what is wrong, didn’t forget it. Rex Murphy, Albertans, Harper—indeed a sad
number of Canadians—just lapped Ralph up.
“Hey, it’s Ralph!” Right on,
Ralph!! Another massive majority.
--then there was Ralph getting pied at the Stampede. Now, most politicians would have taken this
as a fact of life. They would have said,
“hey, I’m a public figure, it goes with the territory.” Not that I’m saying that getting pied is
fun. I would have been p’o’ed, too, no
doubt. Stephen Harper is so terrified of
the public that he hasn’t met one since ’06.
Most European politicians would shrug and turn it around into a PR
winner. Jean Chretien would have
throttled the pie-er. But good ol’
Ralph, Ralph cost Albertan taxpayers 10s of 1000s of dollars$ by prosecuting
the kid who pied him to the nth degree.
Is there one—just one, I mean one—lawyer in Alberta, or even Canada, who
would discuss the 10s of 1000s of $ Albertans spent to prosecute the pie
kid?
I didn’t think so.
But do you know what?
I’ve been embarrassed before. I
could have sucked it up. I wouldn’t have
made the people pay 10s of 1000s of dollars for it. I’m sorry, that’s not leadership. But if you like dictators, it does kind of
fall in step that way.
--obviously one of Ralph’s pieces de resistance was when he rocked up hammered in his
chauffeured car at an Edmonton
homeless shelter and started barking at people to get a job and scattered change around the floor as if homeless people were the cheapest and
most worthless hookers and scum. A
homeless person, who HAD a job, coming in at 1 a.m., wanted Ralph to go home
and get some sleep, so he could, too.
Yep, that was Ralph.
And then there’s the countless unverifiable tales I could tell, the
embarrassment I felt for him and for the people he represented when he was
red-faced and repetitive and more or less completely incapacitated in the
legislature and in public—yep, that was Ralph.
You might have liked to have had a beer with him, but make no mistake,
just as his name bespeaks, he was a nasty, mean-spirited, petty, drunk, fat little
man who scorned the people and sucked up to the rich by letting his province be
governed from boardrooms and not cabinet chambers.
zr
Thank you for this post!
ReplyDeleteThe whitewashing in the mainstream media of Ralph Klein's political record and personal behaviour has been nauseating. It's great to read another perspective.
Also in response to the general media whitewash, in which so many people, and so many sources—who all should know better or at least try to get it right—keep genuflecting before Ralph the great deficit slayer, it’s worth pointing out that the first Canadian province to balance the books in the 90s was Roy Romanow’s NDP government in Saskatchewan, NOT Ralph’s. In a much poorer and less populous province, but also one heavily based on resources (just resources that weren’t and weren’t worth as much as oil) Romanow, through a mature application of both cuts and raises, contained the debt explosion of the Conservative Grant Devine years and returned his province to the stability and fiscal prudence of the NDP Blakeney years. He didn’t use the chemo/blunt axe treatment of Klein, and Saskatchewan still, in general, avoids the spasmodic convulsions of the Alberta economy (thanks to things like not totally selling out the potash industry and for decades having the wheat board), in which the same old basic lessons seem to have to be learned every few years. I know, I know, never let facts get in the way of a good story, but—just sayin’, you know—if you ever really wanted to know who balanced the books first. . . .
ReplyDeleteGood ol’ down-to-earth Ralph was actually an embarrassment, and the media had to scramble to clean up after his obnoxious character and drinking. Typical that the powers-that-be can rewrite history and make people and/or events better or worse than the reality. My gentleman friend has no use for Ralph, he worked in the non-union trades and felt that when Ralph cleaned up Alberta’s economy they lost a lot of benefits that they had previously gained. I worked in an office environment and didn’t notice any changes due to Ralph. Of course not everyone liked him, and now we hear pretty much the same good/bad stuff regarding Margaret Thatcher.
ReplyDeleteThey’d better NOT rename the federal Calgary airport after civic/provincial Ralph, what a dumb move that would be. It’s bad enough to have the Peter Lougheed Centre of the Calgary General Hospital.
Thanks for a differing opinion, I am pretty much a contrarian and don’t go along with most of what the mainstream media says.
Well, hagiographical/hagiography - I learned a new word (not that I’ll ever use it), thank you for that.