Pollsters, Pundits, and Academics Amazed; Blame Voters for Being Unvoterly
You would think that the univocal
Across the 1-degree
Pollsters were flummoxed.
They could not understand why Albertans did not do as they were told to
do. Jack Mintz went into a coma and was
deemed clinically dead, before, rumour has it, his family who had rushed to his
side slowly resuscitated him with sibilant whispering repetitions of “Jack. .
.it ees mee, AlessANDRA. Eet iss mee,
Allessandra Mussolini, you must ees come back and, eh, elp meeee.” Tom Flanagan tore up his citizenship card
before realizing he could never make this much in Texas and got on the horn to Jason Kenney to
restore him as a Canadian asap. Word
came through for the Flanagan family by 3 a.m., thank heavens. Skilled worker.
One pollster, Marc Henry of ThinkHQ Public Affairs Inc., could do nothing but blame the voter. He observed that Albertans had clearly said they were going to vote Wildrose, but then didn’t. Ah-ha. Those sleazy, sneaky voters—saying they’re going to do one thing and then doing another. Throughout recorded time, voters have never done that!! This was all just an attempt to make him look bad! Luckily, Marc Henry had a podium from which he could declare the quisling nature of those sleazy voters, unlike voters.
Stubborn beasts, voters.
I’ve never really seen an election like this. From minute one, virtually every pollster,
pundit, and academic eagerly predicted a massive implosion of the PCs and an
explosion of support for Danielle Smith.
Smith, whose sole claim to fame is that she lived in a bubble doing
right-wing screeds as a journalist, mooted climate change and backed up racist
and homophobic candidates for her party, saying, hey, it’s free speech, we’re
into that. Following Stephen Harper, she
asserted that she wouldn’t legislate on “contentious social issues,” and if
hate-preacher Allan Hunsperger wanted to say that gays would go to hell and die
perpetually in a “lake of fire,” as Hunsperger wrote, well, that was just Al
being Al, and anybody could have an opinion, right? I’m not big on melba toast, but if someone
else wants to eat it, ok, I say. Danielle tried to dipsy-doodle around
toleration, but as Al pointed out in writing, tolerating gays isn’t “kind”;
rather, it’s “cruel,” because they’re all going to burn in a “lake of
fire.” Danielle figured hey, if 30 and a
base worked for Stevie, it’ll work for me.
WHY did every pollster, pundit, and academic eagerly predict a smashing majority for Wildrose?
Because there’s something in it for them. Nobody ever, ever wants to side with the
losers. It’s best not to be on the right
side of history, but the winning side of history.
One laughable . . . well, I’ll let him do it for himself
(get a load of this-- http://www.mtroyal.ca/ProgramsCourses/FacultiesSchoolsCentres/Arts/Departments/PolicyStudies/Faculty/bfoster.htm),
Bruce Foster of Mount Royal
University , nearly made a
promotion out of primping for Danielle.
Often, people who are _supposed_ to know better take it for granted that
they do. They follow people like Presto
Manning (famous solver of complicated problems with simple shibboleths) with
steepled hands towards the money god of rightness. Uh-uh, Bruce, not this time. But rest easy. As long as you keep saying what the right
wants you to say, you’ll have new shoes (or whatever you think teens think is
hot that you think will make teens think that you are hot. Ouch).
Scott Henning, of the far-right Canadian Taxpayers Federation, grimly announced himself pleased that the elected premier,
Pollsters, of course, basically only robocalled seniors who would answer the phone and sit there (party-line phone rings on a treeless plain 100 mi southwest of Medicine Hat, you answer it; it could be your uncle Doug calling you to tell you he just done gone shot off his own foot by mistake, or he’s got BSE and NOW he wants a hospital or a food safety agency), or enter the first 500 000 respondents to a web survey to win a $10 gift certificate to Canadian Tire.
Pundits, craving opportunity like Dracula blood, had no
choice. Buuuuutttt the people; the
people they do not like to be told.
Many Tory pundits, pollsters, and academics have been trying
to salve their wounds by trumpeting that Alberta
would now have a “strong opposition.” Hm. Not even half the governing majority, barely
even what it was under Getty? No doubt,
like Presto, they are already thinking of a Wilderrose Party. See you in
four years. Plus ca va changer.
--zr
No comments:
Post a Comment